Tuesday, February 05, 2008
Stupid standard sizing.
As far as I can tell, nobody makes pants in 32-34 size. What's up with that? 32-32 I can find. 34-32 and 34-34 are easily had. But 32-34 appears to be this mutant pant size. I'd stop exercising and eating well so that my waist climbed back up to 34, except that I'm really enjoying the healthy living stuff.
There's only one reasonable course of action available to me: stop wearing pants.
James



5 Comments:
Or maybe stop using ou belts for bondage, and start using them as clothing accesories?
Actually, belts generally make for bad bondage, as you well know.
And belting down two pant sizes is a bit awkward and silly.
No pants no pants tralalalalala!
I can just picture your wife's reaction when you greet her at the front door after her trip to Australia. "Um dear? You are aware you are wearing no pants? So what are you doing later on tonight?!"
I know what he was doing later on tonight.
Ahem.
(grin)
Post a Comment
<< Home